{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Context XXI","provider_url":"http:\/\/contextxxi.org","title":"Der eigentliche Heidegger\n","author_name":"Kaveh Nassirin","width":"1200","height":"800","url":"https:\/\/forvm.contextxxi.org\/der-eigentliche-heidegger-18005.html","html":"\u003Ch4 class='title'\u003E\u003Ca href='https:\/\/forvm.contextxxi.org\/der-eigentliche-heidegger-18005.html'\u003EDer eigentliche Heidegger\n\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/h4\u003E\u003Cblockquote class='spip'\u003EAbstract: Although it is one of the indispensable standards of relevant research that Heidegger shortly after Being and Time made a \u201eturn\u201c (\u201eKehre\u201c) in the development of his thinking, it can be shown that this is merely due to a misunderstanding or misinterpretation that began in 1949\/50 with an at least incorrect reading of the corresponding passage in the Letter of Humanism. But if this legend of research can be proven as such, the question arises as to what consequences this will \u003Ca href=\"..\/der-eigentliche-heidegger-18005.html\" class=' pts_suite'\u003E(...)\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n"}