{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Context XXI","provider_url":"http:\/\/contextxxi.org","title":"Commentary on Kaveh Nassirin\u00b4s Essay\n","author_name":"Thomas Sheehan","width":"1200","height":"800","url":"https:\/\/forvm.contextxxi.org\/commentary-on-kaveh-nassirin%C2%B4s.html","html":"\u003Ch4 class='title'\u003E\u003Ca href='https:\/\/forvm.contextxxi.org\/commentary-on-kaveh-nassirin%C2%B4s.html'\u003ECommentary on Kaveh Nassirin\u00b4s Essay\n\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/h4\u003E\u003Cblockquote class='spip'\u003ERegarding: Kaveh Nassirin\u2019s \u201cHeideggers Sprachbilder der Bodenlosigkeit und Entwurzelung und ihre Antonyme 1922-1938\/39. Zur Stilistik, Deutung und \u00dcbersetzung,\u201d published in: (1) academia.edu)\n\n\u003Cbr \/\u003EWith the exchange of opinions between Thomas Sheehan and Kaveh Nassirin at academia edu from Octobre 19 to 21, 2018\n\n\u003Cbr \/\u003EThomas Sheehan:\n\n\u003Cbr \/\u003EKaveh Nassirin and I disagree on a number of substantial issues raised in his paper. Below I comment only on some particular issues. The page references are \u003Ca href=\"..\/commentary-on-kaveh-nassirin\u00b4s.html\" class=' pts_suite'\u003E(...)\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n"}